An individual has received £150,000 to compensate her for the injuries she sustained following an unnecessary sub-total hysterectomy. The surgery was performed after an ovarian cyst was suspected to be malignant. However, it was later discovered that the cyst was in fact benign and if the doctor had taken the appropriate steps in the circumstances, including a full review of the various ultrasound images, it would have been clear that the risk of the cyst being malignant was less than five per cent.
The individual had a previous medical history of endometriosis and ovarian cysts. Following concerns that a cyst on her ovary was malignant, she was advised by the doctor to undergo a sub-total hysterectomy, even though there was a high risk that she could develop bowel damage and had previously been told to avoid surgery.
It was alleged that the doctor had failed to review the individual’s various ultrasound images, failed to consider the CA125 tumour marker and failed to refer the matter to the multidisciplinary team before advising the individual to undergo surgery.
Following the advice of the doctor, the individual felt re-assured and underwent surgery. Unfortunately, during the surgery her lateral femoral cutaneous nerve and bowel were damaged. As a result, she suffered from peritonitis (an infection of the abdomen lining) and required emergency surgery to repair the bowel and treat the peritonitis. She sadly became infertile after experiencing early menopause and suffered from many other symptoms, including bowel obstruction, severe abdominal pain, poor mobility and a tingling sensation in her legs.
All of her symptoms were considered to be permanent and had a dramatic effect on her daily life. Her husband had to help her to get in and out of bed and help her with personal hygiene. As household chores became impossible, her husband had to resume the role, including cooking, cleaning, laundry and food shopping.
The hospital admitted liability and a settlement was reached in the sum of £150,000. £60,000 was attributable to the individuals pain and suffering which was considered extensive and permanent. £90,000 was attributable to past and future care costs.
Emily Hartland, a solicitor at Boyes Turner comments:
“This is a sad case involving permanent injuries which could have been avoided. Whilst the compensation will never reverse the damage caused, the money will help the individual and her husband to pay for any future care needs. ”